To the homepage8 800 550 16 91the call is free

WARPOINT knowledge base

VR arena vs other entertainment formats

Compared with escape rooms, trampoline parks, kids' centres and gaming clubs

  • Market
  • 4 min read
A franchise buyer usually chooses not between VR networks but between categories of entertainment. We look at how an arena differs from its neighbours on the market — with the pros and the cons.
A trampoline park, an escape room, a kids' centre, a gaming club and a VR arena compete for the same budget: a family's weekend money and a group's evening money. But they are built differently.

What parameters to compare on

Comparing by "coolness" is pointless. For an owner six things matter: average bill, wear on assets, seasonality, space required, repeat visits and whether the product can be refreshed without a new fit-out.
ParameterVR arenaEscape roomTrampoline parkKids' centre
AudienceChildren, teenagers, adultsMostly 16+Children and teenagersPreschoolers
Refreshing the productContent updatesNew room fit-outEquipment replacementChange of programmes
Wear on assetsEquipment, consumablesSets, propsHigh, physical loadsMedium
SpaceFrom 150 m²Small per roomLarge, high ceilingsMedium
EventsA key source of incomeLimitedYesYes
Repeat visitsFor new contentOnce per scenarioRegularMemberships
A qualitative comparison of categories. The figures of a specific venue depend on the city, the location and management.

Escape rooms: the one-time problem

The format's main limitation is that a scenario is played once. A guest who has done the quest will not come back to the same room, and a repeat visit needs a new scenario — in effect a new fit-out of the premises.
For an arena, refreshing the product means refreshing the content: games and mechanics arrive on the same equipment, in the same hall, without construction work.

Trampoline parks: wear and injuries

A format with high physical wear: trampoline beds, foam, fastenings — everything gets used up and needs regular replacement. Plus higher requirements for insurance and supervision.
A VR arena also consumes equipment, but that is a predictable line item, not a permanent construction site inside the hall.

Kids' centres: a narrow audience

They work for preschoolers and younger schoolchildren. As soon as the child grows up, the family leaves the category.
An arena's audience is wider: 45% are children aged 6 to 14, but another 35% are adults aged 25 and over and 20% are teenagers and young people. A child who came at seven is still a guest at fourteen and at twenty.
What this gives in practice
A wide age range means the arena works on a weekday evening, at the weekend and during the school holidays — just with different groups. Hence the absence of a pronounced dead season.

Gaming clubs: a different economy

A club sells hours at a computer — the guest comes alone or with friends, but each at their own machine. That is a low average bill and a high dependence on regulars.
An arena sells an event for a group. Hence a different bill and a different role for events: they account for 40–60% of a location's revenue, which a club structurally cannot have.

Honestly about the downsides of a VR arena

The format is not perfect, and it is better to know the limitations in advance:
  • Premises requirements are stricter than for most neighbours: you need an unobstructed hall, height, ventilation, power supply
  • The equipment is consumable — a replacement reserve must be set aside from the first month
  • The entry threshold is higher than for an escape room: from $60K against considerably smaller sums for some formats
  • Trained staff are needed — the administrator here is not a cashier but the host of the session
  • Dependence on content. Without updates the format ages like any other
The last point is exactly what decides whether to join a network: in-house game development and regular updates are what cannot be managed alone.